Okay, I know I will catch flak for this one, but I’m going to do it anyway.
Here’s the thing. I hate anyone that calls them self an anything-ist.
Racist, chauvinist, feminist, humanist, environmentalist, etc.
Of course there are a few exceptions. A pugilist is a boxer, and I like Boxing, but that’s different. I am talking about groups of people that consider themselves champions of a cause, or superior to another group of people.
See, the problem is that once you label yourself one of those titles, you are putting yourself above something.
An environmentalist will take the side of nature in every case, regardless of any actual need to.
A chauvinist paints himself as superior to women. The humanist forgets there are other things in the world that need caring for.
A racist fails to see that there is only one human race, and everything else is just environmental conditioning.
And; in a staggering display of hypocrisy, feminists simultaneously cry for equality yet say they are better than men, and doing so show themselves as no better than the chauvinists they oppose.
Now I hold no fondness for chauvinist’s, nor do I completely disagree with some of the things feminists have changed, and want to.
Women still get a more raw deal in many areas of life than men. Yet I still hold feminists in more contempt.
I have no problem with Police Officer, rather than policeman and other such changes.
But they take it too far.
Changing Manhole cover to Person hole cover does nothing to change things,
and it’s silly. They defeat themselves by trying to push foolish things on people, then call it
anti-women when they don’t get their way. More on that later.
I have no problem with equality. In fact the real problem is I seek equality more than most feminists do.
Radical Feminists de-motivational poster
No, the modus operandi of the feminist is not equality, it’s revenge. They want payback for the abuses of the past.
Yet they claim to be superior to men…
you see, I don’t think there is really anything men and women can’t do equally well. I don’t think either is better than the other.
One problem is that the feminist agenda has changed things drastically. It could be said that just being a man is bad these days.
The “Metro-Sexual” has become the norm, and most women wont even consider a real man as a potential date. It’s wrong to be hairy, or have a strong natural Oder, or be free with ones’ appearance. No, men are expected to spend as much time on dolling themselves up as women do.
We must groom the hair to perfection, wear overpriced and smelly man-perfume, shave or wax away our hair and be as feminine as we possibly can.
Another problem is that women are allowed to say whatever they want about men and no one bats an eye. If a man says anything about a women that isn’t complimentary, you can hear the metaphorical pin drop. This goes back to anything that prevents women from getting their way, being anti-women.
Women are by nature, conceited. They cannot tolerate anything unflattering being said about them. Any man that calls a woman on her BS, is a pig or one of the other many terms women use to belittle men.
The reason women get away with this is that while the men will no doubt agree with the unflattering remark, any with a women will raise in defense.
The reason for this is simple.
Men figured out a long time ago how to deal with women. Let them get the last word, and do as they ask because it’s the easiest way to shut her up without getting ones’ self in the dog house.
Yes ladies, that is why he does stuff for you so quickly. He isn’t being sweet, he isn’t tamed or house broken or pussy whipped, he just wants you to shut up. Because, he knows that if he gives you what you want now, he can get away with more later.
This does not change the fact that you ladies are not perfect. You are not the better half. The saying “behind every great man is a better woman” IS just a saying, and a sexist one at that.
Get real?
Men are not better than women, but women are certainly not better than men either.
Why don’t we try this one on for size? No One is better than anyone else.
Something feminists like to say is that if women were in charge there would be no wars.
Much like a religion they spout this non-sense, without anything to back it up, and failing to ever research the topic.
There have been Women rulers through history, and they displayed every shade of grey male rulers have in their practices.
Ranging from Benevolent, to tyrannical, to homicidal and genocidal.
Women are just as capable of ruler ship as men, but they are not better at it.
After all, men might be more quick to be violent, but women are no less capable of it. Just ask any man that’s ever had his car fucked up because his girl thought he was cheating.
Lorena Bobbitt is a good example of this. Women are every bit as capable of “An Eye for an Eye” justice as men, or in that case
“A dick for my dignity”.
Saying Women are better than men, because of the treatments of the past, is just one more form of that mentality. It does nothing to heal the damage done, and works to further push men and women apart, and that is their greatest “sin” of all.
To wrap this up I will say that people need to get over themselves. No one is really better than anyone else, not inherently at any rate.
A condition of birth does not make anyone better than anyone else.
Self-contrived conditions are another matter. Living your life a certain way by choice, is very different than being born a certain way.
So I readily say I am superior to the Feminists, not because I am a Chauvinist, but because I am not an “ist” at all.
The world would be a far better place without all the “ists” running about making life harder for others.
Well I’ve said my peace on that topic, and feel free to leave comments insulting my mother,
bashing, flaming, arguing, agreeing, praising or worshiping as you see fit.
