They just don’t understand why us straight people wont let them be.

I went over the topic of homo behavior in this article.

The basic premise here is that no matter how natural homosexuality might be, it is still not normal. Only about 10-15% (don’t quote me on that, I came across that number somewhere and I think it’s too high. I think it’s likely less than 5% ) of the population has ever had any homosexual experiences, and many of those people are bi-sexual.

To someone that is repulsed by homosexual behavior, which is most people, same sex public displays of affection are no different than a guy walking down the street in a full gimp suit, with ball gag, being whipped by his dom.

I don’t care who you fuck in private. Or how you like to fuck for that matter (as long as it’s consensual) Just keep it private.

Not every TV show has to have a lesbian or Homo on it. I am a fan of the show Bones. On the show two characters Hodges and Angela, started developing a relationship near the end of season one. It budded in season 2, and progressed through season 3.

Suddenly in season 4 their engagement is called off after one argument. Only a few episodes later Angela is suddenly bi-sexual and starts a relationship with another women. Despite at least two previous occurrences of behavior suggesting slight homophobia. I have recently been watching the series from DvD, a few episodes a night, sorta puts new perspective on it.

Apparently a romance that held side story line status for nearly the whole series ended just so they can put a lesbian relationship into the show.

Who would like to bet they did it because of complaints of some sort from the queers?

I don’t care what the fags want. They are a minority. One based on a sexual fetish, mental problem or genetic defect causing a miss-wired brain.

Again. I really could care less about what you do at home. That’s your deal, your life. When you put it on display, then it becomes everyone’s deal, everyone’s life. If they want TV shows that cater to them, let one of them come up with a queer cable/sat channel just like every other special interest group.

Queers need to stop acting like they aren’t different. This is an issue that transcends nationality, color and creed. The act of mating is one of the most fundamental drives all animals have, including humans. Homosexuality is against that drive.

It’s like seeing a person with anorexia that has given up eating, or someone doing something incredibly dangerous who has set aside survival instinct.

It’s disturbing to most people at some level.

People don’t understand why I am anti-social. The need to be part of groups, and cliques and things is also part of what it is to be human. Non-social types are also given a hard time.

Queers need to understand that when you defy something as basic to what it is to be alive as the desire to mate, people are not going to view you in a positive light.

Regardless the point of this article/rant is their desire to be “OUT”. By which I mean a dyke wearing men’s clothes, and trying to walk and talk like a man. The problem here is they end up acting like a cartoony version of a man, which is not funny only pathetic and annoying. Similarly fags that feel a need to act as “fruity” as they possibly can, even though for every one I’ve been around, I have readily seen examples of it is a conscious act on their part to do so.

What I am talking about is the notion that acting, or dressing in a particular way is okay for them. They are expressing themselves, fine I have no problem with people expressing themselves as long as it doesn’t cause significant problems for others. There in lay the problem.

Now to be honest, I enjoy going into preppy restaurants, and other such places with my heavy metal shirts on, and such. I do this as a conscious choice to bug the squares. However I don’t compare the way queers act and dress to that, so much as someone going into a church on sunday in full S&M garb. Not that I wouldn’t find that funny, considering my attitude towards churches.
Queers on the other hand bring that sort of “outrage” wherever they go. Then WE, not they, but We are just supposed to deal with it. I, and many others don’t want to. I have no real quarrel with queers, I just don’t like being around them or having anything to do with them. I am reminded of a night I was flicking through channels, and came across some queer show on cable, and the scene involved guys making out. I was actually physically ill from seeing this. My stomach churned, and I felt like I was going to vomit.

This is not an issue of holding queers back, or keeping them down. It is an issue with them causing other people discomfort.
What you do in the privacy of your homes is your business. Who you fuck, and who you marry is your business. What you wear, and how you act outside around everyone else, becomes everyone Else’s business.

You are abusing your freedoms, and making life more uncomfortable for a lot of people. Many of which wouldn’t care about you and what your lifestyle is like otherwise. But you just have to shove it in our faces don’t you.

You are natural, but you are also Abnormal. By broken birth, brain, or both you are destined to be found annoying/disgusting by more people than not. Pick your battles, and keep the queen/butch under control around us, and the problem is solved.
Unless of course, you are making a choice to “outrage”, in which case you are making life more difficult for others, don’t be surprised when they make it more difficult for you.

That’s my thoughts on that subject. Please leave comments Abusing me, hating me, loving me, worshipping me or any color of commentary in-between. You can also sign up and discuss in the forum.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts

Here’s the thing. I hate anyone that calls them self an anything-ist.

Racist, chauvinist, feminist, humanist, environmentalist, etc.

Of course there are a few exceptions. A pugilist is a boxer, and I like Boxing, but that’s different. I am talking about groups of people that consider themselves champions of a cause, or superior to another group of people.

See, the problem is that once you label yourself one of those titles, you are putting yourself above something.
An environmentalist will take the side of nature in every case, regardless of any actual need to.
A chauvinist paints himself as superior to women. The humanist forgets there are other things in the world that need caring for.
A racist fails to see that there is only one human race, and everything else is just environmental conditioning.
And; in a staggering display of hypocrisy, feminists simultaneously cry for equality yet say they are better than men, and doing so show themselves as no better than the chauvinists they oppose.

Now I hold no fondness for chauvinist’s, nor do I completely disagree with some of the things feminists have changed, and want to.
Women still get a more raw deal in many areas of life than men. Yet I still hold feminists in more contempt.
I have no problem with Police Officer, rather than policeman and other such changes.
But they take it too far.
Changing Manhole cover to Person hole cover does nothing to change things,
and it’s silly. They defeat themselves by trying to push foolish things on people, then call it
anti-women when they don’t get their way. More on that later.

I have no problem with equality. In fact the real problem is I seek equality more than most feminists do.

Radical Feminists de-motivational poster

No, the modus operandi of the feminist is not equality, it’s revenge. They want payback for the abuses of the past.

Yet they claim to be superior to men…

you see, I don’t think there is really anything men and women can’t do equally well. I don’t think either is better than the other.

One problem is that the feminist agenda has changed things drastically. It could be said that just being a man is bad these days.
The “Metro-Sexual” has become the norm, and most women wont even consider a real man as a potential date. It’s wrong to be hairy, or have a strong natural Oder, or be free with ones’ appearance. No, men are expected to spend as much time on dolling themselves up as women do.
We must groom the hair to perfection, wear overpriced and smelly man-perfume, shave or wax away our hair and be as feminine as we possibly can.

Another problem is that women are allowed to say whatever they want about men and no one bats an eye. If a man says anything about a women that isn’t complimentary, you can hear the metaphorical pin drop. This goes back to anything that prevents women from getting their way, being anti-women.
Women are by nature, conceited. They cannot tolerate anything unflattering being said about them. Any man that calls a woman on her BS, is a pig or one of the other many terms women use to belittle men.

The reason women get away with this is that while the men will no doubt agree with the unflattering remark, any with a women will raise in defense.

The reason for this is simple.

Men figured out a long time ago how to deal with women. Let them get the last word, and do as they ask because it’s the easiest way to shut her up without getting ones’ self in the dog house.

Yes ladies, that is why he does stuff for you so quickly. He isn’t being sweet, he isn’t tamed or house broken or pussy whipped, he just wants you to shut up. Because, he knows that if he gives you what you want now, he can get away with more later.

This does not change the fact that you ladies are not perfect. You are not the better half. The saying “behind every great man is a better woman” IS just a saying, and a sexist one at that.

Get real?

Men are not better than women, but women are certainly not better than men either.

Why don’t we try this one on for size? No One is better than anyone else.

Something feminists like to say is that if women were in charge there would be no wars.

Much like a religion they spout this non-sense, without anything to back it up, and failing to ever research the topic.

There have been Women rulers through history, and they displayed every shade of grey male rulers have in their practices.
Ranging from Benevolent, to tyrannical, to homicidal and genocidal.

Women are just as capable of ruler ship as men, but they are not better at it.

After all, men might be more quick to be violent, but women are no less capable of it. Just ask any man that’s ever had his car fucked up because his girl thought he was cheating.

Lorena Bobbitt is a good example of this. Women are every bit as capable of “An Eye for an Eye” justice as men, or in that case
“A dick for my dignity”.
Saying Women are better than men, because of the treatments of the past, is just one more form of that mentality. It does nothing to heal the damage done, and works to further push men and women apart, and that is their greatest “sin” of all.

To wrap this up I will say that people need to get over themselves. No one is really better than anyone else, not inherently at any rate.
A condition of birth does not make anyone better than anyone else.

Self-contrived conditions are another matter. Living your life a certain way by choice, is very different than being born a certain way.
So I readily say I am superior to the Feminists, not because I am a Chauvinist, but because I am not an “ist” at all.

The world would be a far better place without all the “ists” running about making life harder for others.

Well I’ve said my peace on that topic, and feel free to leave comments insulting my mother,
bashing, flaming, arguing, agreeing, praising or worshiping as you see fit.

Walmart.

Time announced today that Walmart is planning a new program, that seems specifically designed to try and put it’s competitors out of business. While this may seem like a redundancy, since all businesses want to put their competition out of business, the problem here is simple.

Walmart views everyone as their competition.

Here is the opening paragraph, it spells out the problem, without trying to draw attention to it.

“Walmart loves to shock and awe. City-size stores, absurdly low prices ($8 jeans!) and everything from milk to Matchbox toys on its shelves. And with the recession forcing legions of stores into bankruptcy, the world’s largest retailer now apparently wants to take out the remaining survivors.”

The economy is already in bad shape. If they drive all those stores out of business, what happens to the workers? I pose another simple question. If our economy collapses, who will be shopping at Walmart?

This is why I hate corporations. They have forgotten the cardinal rules of Economics. Don’t charge more than the people can afford, and don’t risk your customer base.

You see it in every type of corporation. They only care about keeping their margins up, and to hell with the consequences. Traditionally during a bad recession, businesses lower their prices to accommodate and preserve their customer base. Yet during this recession, prices just keep going up.

Minimum wage was raised for the first time in years, so they just raised their prices. It is a sobering and pathetic fact that the minimum wage, and the cost of living have not been balanced since the 50s-60s, Which means a minimum wage earner then, was actually making better money (by comparison), than a higher dollar earner now.

The problem with Walmart is they do have lower prices than almost everyone else, and that’s why people shop there. Except the result, is that all the other stores are losing customers, and going out of business.
While part of me acknowledges the fact it’s their own fault for chasing off their customers with higher prices, I also shudder to think at what would happen if the only store left to shop at was Walmart.

Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts